Loading
Imagem principal do projeto O Globo · Testes A/B

Product Design · Conversão & Aquisição | Editora Globo

O Globo · Testes A/B

Year

Since 2023

Role

Product Designer & Front-end

Duration

Ongoing program

Team

Multidisciplinar

Tools

Figma · HTML · CSS · JS · Google Ads

The problem

Subscription acquisition pages changed based on opinion, with no evidence of which version converted better.

My role

Product Designer & Front-end: owner of the design and implementation of the variants in HTML/CSS/JS, within a cross-functional program with Digital Channels and marketing.

The outcome

A continuous A/B testing program validated on Google Ads; winning variants become the standard across brand channels without sacrificing LTV.

Overview

A continuous A/B testing program on subscription acquisition pages for Editora Globo brands — O Globo, Valor Econômico and Clube O Globo — with occasional tests on Grupo Globo partnerships, such as Globoplay. Hypotheses come from Digital Channels, driven by subscription-media benchmarks, and I own the design and implementation of the variants. Each test is validated on Google Ads and then rolled out to internal channels. The focus is to grow conversion without sacrificing subscriber LTV.

The problem

Acquisition pages live in constant tension: they must convert now, but without attracting the wrong subscriber, who churns early and drags down LTV. Optimizing only for immediate conversion can be costly down the line.

My role in the program

The hypothesis originates in Digital Channels, and Marketing consolidates the test proposal. From there, the design and the code of the variants are entirely mine: I am responsible for structuring the landing pages and putting each test live. I then co-present the results together with Marketing. It is a role of owning execution within a cross-functional program, not a solo project.

A test's lifecycle

01
Hypothesis

Digital Channels spots the opportunity and Marketing consolidates the test proposal.

02
Prioritization

Hypotheses are prioritized by effort × impact before entering the queue.

03
Design & build

I design and implement the variants in HTML, CSS and JavaScript. This stage is mine.

04
Live (80/20)

The test runs on an 80/20 model on Google Ads, preserving the institutional campaign's CPA.

05
Read-out

Digital Channels measures the experiment and cross-references media data with the subscriptions CRM.

06
Decision & rollout

Marketing, design and channels decide together; the winning variant goes to internal channels.

Each cycle takes about two weeks. The program has run since 2023, with one or two active tests every month, covering O Globo, Valor Econômico and Clube O Globo.

Who does what

Digital Channels
  • Brings the business problem
  • Formulates the hypothesis
  • Measures the experiment
  • Cross-references media and CRM
  • Reads the results
Marketing
  • Consolidates the test proposal
  • Takes part in the decision
  • Co-presents the results
Design — me
  • Variant design
  • Implementation in HTML/CSS/JS
  • I structure and ship the tests live
  • I take part in the decision
  • I co-present the results

How we test

Benchmark-driven hypotheses (NYT, FYT)80/20 model to preserve campaign CPAValidation first on Google AdsRollout to internal channels: on-site placements, backend barrier and AMPCross analysis: media platform + subscriptions CRM

Each test starts from a subscription-media benchmark and runs on an 80/20 model, preserving the institutional campaign CPA. The hypothesis that wins on Google Ads is taken to internal channels.

The two approaches tested: the current (institutional) page and the more direct variant inspired by benchmarks.
The two approaches tested: the current (institutional) page and the more direct variant inspired by benchmarks.

Design decisions

Reordering priorities: value before priceSocial proof earlier on the pagePrint product highlighted at the topShorter form and direct CTAHook and incentive tested per brand

The winning variant is rarely a full redesign. It is almost always a reordering of priorities: bringing value and social proof up and making the decision easier.

The test program

O Globo · Institutional
Direct LP (NYT style) vs institutional

The more direct approach outperformed the institutional one in conversion and margin.

O Globo · Institutional
Print product highlighted at the top

Moving the print product to the top of the page raised the share of conversions and margin.

Globoplay · Grupo Globo partnership
Globoplay tagline in the offer

Adding the Globoplay tagline to the page improved conversion and margin.

Valor Econômico · Institutional
Direct LP vs benchmark (FYT)

The more direct version increased conversion and reduced cost per acquisition.

Valor Econômico: the direct LP tested against the benchmark (FYT).
Valor Econômico: the direct LP tested against the benchmark (FYT).

Learnings

Media and CRM tell different stories about the same saleThe platform recommends reading by its own attribution model, which doesn't always match the CRMQuality vs. volume: the direct variant captures better but may cost more per subscriberLTV as the central metric: conversion alone is not the whole storyInconclusive to scale without analyzing the payback period first

The most important learning did not come from comparing A and B, but from within the analysis: the media platform and the subscriptions CRM diverged on the same sales. Reading the result by the media's attribution model or by the CRM led to different decisions, which changed how the team decides which campaigns to scale.

Status & rollout

Tests are validated on Google Ads and then taken to internal channels (on-site placements, backend barrier and AMP).

The figures for each test are confidential and are not shown here. The focus is the direction of results and what each experiment taught.